Dr. David E. Martin Calls For Total Destruction Of The World Health Organization (WHO) For Crimes Against Humanity & Bio-Terrorism

Bioterroryzm

 

   
0:00
a very small number of criminal
0:02
industrial conspirators
0:05
decided to subordinate the entirety of
0:08
the human population for the purpose of
0:11
their Sinister plans to enrich
0:14
themselves while impoverishing and
0:17
killing
0:18
the rest of humanity
0:20
and I'm done being polite
0:22
we've long past polite
0:26
when the words acceptable death rate
0:28
become part of an industrial Norm
0:31
we have lost the plot of humanity
0:35
and that's not my words
0:37
those were the words of the World Health
0:39
Organization Anna Pfizer and of moderna
0:43
when they were given the authorization
0:45
to begin the process of killing human
0:47
beings in the interest of advancing
0:50
their goals
0:52
next slide
0:55
and I'm also not going to sugarcoat this
0:59
this is a criminal cartel
1:02
we are acting as though there's some
1:04
sort of redeemable quality somewhere in
1:07
some esoteric layer that somehow or
1:10
another the World Health Organization
1:11
must have some salutatory benefit
1:15
well I'm going to tell you since its
1:17
formation in the 1940s the World Health
1:19
Organization has been nothing more than
1:22
a criminal cartel that has a soul and
1:25
singular intent
1:27
and I will show you the document that
1:29
proves what I'm saying this is not an
1:32
allegation
1:33
this is actually provable by their own
1:36
words in their own hand and they used a
1:39
four-step process to execute every one
1:42
of their nefarious plans they begin by
1:45
planning an exercise then they go to the
1:48
business of funding that exercise then
1:50
they create the rationale for the thing
1:53
that they're going to do and then they
1:55
deploy and profit from it and in
1:57
violation of 15 U.S code section 19
2:01
which for those of you listening
2:03
coincidentally Started With The Clayton
2:06
Act in the same year that the World
2:08
Health Organization in the United States
2:10
1913 the same year the World Health
2:12
organization's progenitors also started
2:15
so I find it fascinating that we passed
2:17
The Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in
2:20
motion 110 years ago the criminal
2:22
conspiracy which we now call the World
2:24
Health Organization
2:26
110 years later
2:30
translation of tifu or tepey I don't
2:33
even know how to say it the tfeu the
2:36
treaty allegedly for the functioning of
2:38
the European Union which I think needs
2:40
to now be called the treaty for the
2:41
dysfunctional European cabal
2:45
article 101 unambiguously lays out the
2:48
conditions that this was never a public
2:50
health anything
2:52
it was racketeering for the purpose of
2:55
instilling Terror to adapt the behavior
2:58
of a population period that's what it
3:02
was that's what it always was and we can
3:04
come up with every theoretical argument
3:06
we want to make about things but the
3:08
problem even with the theory that we had
3:10
an outbreak of something
3:13
is falsifiable for the data from Zurich
3:16
that shows us that in the year of the
3:20
death pandemic of the globe
3:22
life insurance companies paid 30 billion
3:26
dollars Less in claims
3:29
now if there's a medical professional or
3:32
a social professional or anybody else
3:33
who wants to debate that we could
3:35
develop a virus cunningly that could
3:37
find out your bank account your
3:40
insurance policy statements and whether
3:42
you're paid up on your premiums that's a
3:45
big ask
3:47
it turns out that the data is
3:49
unambiguous
3:50
we did not have a pandemic we had
3:52
genocide
3:54
and we need to call it what it is
3:57
next slide
4:00
when I say we planned it let's make sure
4:02
we understand exactly the not so fine
4:05
print of the fine print and I want to
4:08
call your attention first to the right
4:10
hand column of the slide this is the
4:12
2011 data that the World Health
4:14
Organization the welcome trust path and
4:17
the Gates Foundation did on their
4:19
wonderful worldwide program for a
4:21
malaria vaccine for children under the
4:24
age of six months of age
4:26
and in their clinical trial it's helpful
4:28
to point out that they murdered 66
4:31
children in the vaccine group and then
4:35
cunning you cunningly used the term
4:38
control
4:40
for a control group in which they
4:41
murdered 28 children
4:44
now the reason I said murdered and the
4:47
reason why I use that term is because
4:48
it's exactly what it was
4:51
because it turns out that this control
4:53
group was not a saline injection it was
4:56
not some sort of innocuous innocent
4:59
thing it was actually a cocktail of
5:01
other known pathogenic disease carrying
5:04
injections the control group was known
5:07
to kill people and the experimental
5:09
control group was actually theoretically
5:11
maybe going to kill people and what we
5:13
did was we actually went ahead and
5:15
murdered them all
5:18
and cunningly under Article 5 Section 13
5:22
which I've put on this slide I want you
5:24
to understand why I said at its
5:27
formation in 1947 when the who was
5:31
funded and founded it was funded and
5:33
founded by people intent to commit a
5:36
crime because of their own language
5:40
section 13 of Article 5 ends with the
5:43
following statement immunity from
5:45
personal arrest or detention blah blah
5:48
blah immunity from legal process of
5:50
every kind
5:54
now if you didn't intend to commit a
5:57
crime
5:59
why would you need to give yourself
6:01
permanent and absolute immunity
6:05
from every form of prosecution and its
6:08
worse even investigation for prosecution
6:11
of every kind
6:14
people sit there and pretend well that's
6:16
like diplomatic immunity do you realize
6:18
this isn't even meeting the standard of
6:21
diplomatic immunity
6:23
this is a criminal organization who set
6:25
in motion their own law to protect
6:27
themselves against crimes they knew they
6:30
were going to commit and when I say they
6:32
knew they were going to commit I mean
6:34
they knew it
6:36
because their first director General
6:38
none other than Dr Renee San who
6:41
happened to be in the hospitality of the
6:44
Germans in Dachau in 1940 earlier in
6:49
1947 mysteriously with the largest of
6:54
the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated
6:56
to become the first director general of
6:58
The Who
6:59
and within five short years Renee sand
7:03
decided to authorize the real purpose of
7:06
the who in writing by then director
7:09
General Dr Brock Chisholm who advocated
7:14
for population control as its primary
7:18
objective does that sound like public
7:20
health to anyone in this room
7:22
this is not Public Health this is the
7:25
advancement of the same genocidal
7:27
program that began with the Carnegie
7:29
foundation's funding of the Eugenics
7:31
office at Cold Spring labs in the United
7:34
States in 1913 under the philanthropy
7:39
philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie
7:43
people stop fooling yourself
7:45
we debate the leaves on the tree of what
7:49
we call this pandemic thing but we're
7:52
not going to the root this was an
7:55
organized crime racketeering entity set
7:58
up to give itself first absolute
8:01
immunity and then execute its plans to
8:04
make sure it controls who lives who dies
8:07
and who gets any chance at life
8:11
and if you think that I am somehow
8:15
inflating numbers let me be unambiguous
8:18
under every treatment of tax provision
8:22
if I were to tell you that there is an
8:24
88 percent controlling interest of any
8:27
organization you might conclude that
8:30
that was that actually Aggregates into a
8:33
controlling interest
8:35
and it turns out that if we look at the
8:37
foundation donations to the World Health
8:40
Organization
8:42
88 of those come from a single
8:45
organization The Gates Foundation
8:48
that constitutes a violation of every
8:52
competitivist law in Europe and every
8:55
competitors law in the United States
8:58
this is absolutely not only not an
9:02
independent charitably funded donation
9:04
but more importantly under the tax laws
9:07
on both sides of the Atlantic this
9:09
constitutes directed donations which
9:12
specifically are forbidden
9:14
and do not have any place anywhere in
9:17
the charter of the World Health
9:19
Organization or any of the UN Affiliated
9:22
organizations when I say this is a crime
9:24
I mean it's a tax crime a racketeering
9:27
crime a money laundering crime and now
9:29
the crime of racketeering leading the
9:31
murder and Global terrorism next slide
9:37
I told you that the second thing after
9:39
they plan it is they fund it and why
9:41
don't we use the criminals language in
9:44
their own words because it's the best
9:45
way to say it
9:47
when they actually planned the release
9:51
of the use of a biologically modified
9:55
Chimera associated with the model
9:58
derived from coronavirus they actually
10:01
said the following
10:03
to sustain the funding based beyond the
10:05
crisis we need to increase the public
10:07
understanding for the needful medical
10:09
countermeasures such as a pan influenza
10:12
or pan coronavirus vaccine now let me
10:15
pause for just one moment and remind you
10:17
that the crisis that they were speaking
10:19
of was a crisis of diminishing funding
10:24
there was no Health crisis this was a
10:28
crisis of their coffers we're starting
10:30
to run dry that's the crisis
10:34
and let's read on a key driver is the
10:37
media and the economics will follow the
10:40
hype
10:41
we need to use that hype to our
10:44
advantage to get to the real issues
10:47
investors will respond if they see
10:49
profit at the end of the process
10:52
that is officially the statement made by
10:57
the conspiratorial cabal that by that
11:00
time was the decade of vaccines put in
11:02
Motion in 2011 by the global
11:05
preparedness monitoring Board of the
11:06
World Health Organization and it was the
11:09
funding base for Peter dashik's
11:11
partnership with the chimeric production
11:14
of pathogens both in North Carolina and
11:17
in Wuhan
11:19
so don't tell me that we have to do an
11:21
investigation into where this came from
11:23
the criminals have admitted to it in
11:26
their own words next slide
11:30
and now we get the fun one that no one
11:32
in Congress is willing to address which
11:35
is the elephant in the room
11:37
on October the 21st 2014 despite the
11:42
multiple conversations between Senator
11:44
Rand Paul and Anthony fauci where we've
11:46
been told that Rand Paul has done
11:48
everything he can to put fauci on the
11:49
ropes he has had in his possession the
11:51
letter that you see on the left and it
11:54
is the letter conveniently on niaid
11:57
letterhead sent to the University of
11:59
North Carolina Chapel Hill which
12:01
unambiguously states that during the
12:03
gain of function moratorium which by the
12:05
way if we use the word moratorium feels
12:08
like that means you're supposed to stop
12:09
why don't we go ahead and look at two
12:11
pieces of this letter first the second
12:13
bullet under project one which by the
12:16
way was not part of the original Grant
12:18
this was to look at the novel functions
12:22
of the virus pathogenesis in Vivo you
12:25
know what that means in living systems
12:28
the grant was supposed to be clinical
12:30
simulations and models but this grant
12:33
was modified with this letter to say we
12:36
were going to authorize gain a function
12:38
research during the moratorium in living
12:41
systems and then we love the last
12:44
paragraph of this letter which
12:46
conveniently says as your Grant is
12:48
currently funded this pause is voluntary
12:53
how many times have you met a voluntary
12:57
moratorium
13:02
and the best part about it is that if we
13:04
look at the very last line
13:07
or continue to conduct the applicable
13:09
gain of function research until the end
13:13
of the currently active budget period
13:16
But Here Comes the problem
13:18
you know who is supplying the budget
13:21
an indefinite term
13:23
unlimited amount
13:26
contract from DARPA and from NIH isn't
13:30
it convenient to have a perpetually
13:32
funded project that needs to stop when
13:35
the money runs out when you find out
13:37
that there is no point where the money
13:40
runs out because there is no end to the
13:43
thing that has no end
13:46
unless you think that I'm making an
13:48
allegation
13:49
which I'm not I'm making an accusation
13:52
let's be clear
13:54
and there's a big difference I'm not
13:56
alleging anything
13:58
they actually went to the trouble of
14:00
telling us that it was going to be the
14:01
Wuhan virus that was going to get us
14:05
as you see on the right hand side of the
14:08
screen published in 2016 March 14th of
14:12
2016. he stars like Wuhan Institute of
14:17
virology virus 1 and I quote is poised
14:20
for human emergence
14:24
does that sound like we're just
14:25
surprised that something in Wuhan when a
14:29
little Haywire in December of 2019 or
14:32
does it feel like we were told look at
14:34
Wuhan
14:36
and look at coronavirus and look at what
14:38
we've been doing to manipulate
14:40
coronavirus in Wuhan and in the
14:42
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
14:44
and lo and behold we're going to go
14:45
ahead and tell you that we're ready to
14:47
release it
14:48
in 2016.
14:51
next slide
14:53
we're almost done
14:55
and then they created it
14:57
now all of you know that I am criticized
15:00
globally for my use of the term
15:02
biological warfare I do that because I
15:05
am credentialed to do that
15:08
I happen to be for the United States
15:11
government in the early part of the
15:13
2000s in the latter part of the 90s a
15:15
person who was sent around the world to
15:17
look at the proliferation of biological
15:19
and chemical weapons I'm acutely
15:21
familiar with the definition of what a
15:23
biological warfare agent is in the 18
15:27
U.S code the criminal code of violations
15:30
of biological and chemical weapons and
15:33
so my assessment is in fact professional
15:36
and right
15:37
and the reason for that is I'm the one
15:40
credentialed to make that determination
15:42
for the United States government for
15:44
many years that's why I say it but let's
15:48
pretend for the moment that I'm just a
15:50
nut job
15:52
maybe I don't know what I'm talking
15:53
about
15:55
so why don't we look at what the
15:57
criminals said themselves shall we
16:00
in 2005
16:03
at a conference sponsored by DARPA and
16:06
the miter Corporation Ralph Barrick the
16:09
architect of the lethal strand that has
16:12
been injected into millions and billions
16:15
of people's arms that Ralph Barrick was
16:19
sponsored to present the following and
16:21
let's go ahead and use his words
16:23
presentation synthetic coronaviruses
16:27
biohacking bio Warfare enabling
16:31
Technologies
16:34
does that sound like a public health
16:36
distribution program does that sound
16:37
like something that is accidentally
16:40
misinterpreted to mean something else or
16:42
does biological warfare enabling
16:45
Technologies sound like not
16:47
countermeasures or pandemic preparedness
16:50
it sounds to me like biological warfare
16:53
enabling Technologies and the reason why
16:56
I have that hunch is what followed was
16:59
he received next to his niaid grants
17:03
non-competitive DARPA grants in matching
17:05
funds for over 140 million dollars of
17:09
aggregate funding going into his and his
17:12
related programs on synthetic biological
17:15
warfare enabling Technologies so do I
17:18
have a problem calling the injection a
17:21
biological warfare enabling technology
17:23
absolutely not because that's what they
17:26
called it
17:28
and we know that they knew they called
17:31
it that on September 18 2019 because on
17:35
September 18 2019 the racketeering
17:39
co-conspiring cabal of interlocking
17:41
directorates also known as the World
17:44
Health Organization said that they were
17:46
going to conduct an expert experience
17:48
for the world that was going to be a
17:52
rapidly spreading pandemic due to a
17:55
lethal respiratory pathogen The
17:58
lethality in that statement is the
18:00
problem
18:01
they didn't say we're going to maybe get
18:03
a little bit of Sniffles going around
18:06
they said we were going to actually have
18:08
the promulgation of a deadly agent
18:11
and the stated reason in September 2020
18:15
the progress indicator is that the world
18:18
would accept a universal vaccine
18:22
not
18:23
we'll look at other options of treatment
18:26
not we'll have a look at what might be
18:28
early intervention as Dr McCullough has
18:31
so clearly advocated for in many many
18:34
many instances
18:36
not that we stated on September 18 2019
18:41
we were intending to kill
18:45
and we were intending to kill to create
18:48
the fear that would drive people to
18:50
accept something that without coercion
18:53
no one would have accepted
18:55
and that's published by the criminal
18:57
racketeers next slide and there's only
19:00
two to go if you're following
19:02
deploy and profit from it
19:04
we were told investors will respond if
19:07
they see profit at the end of the
19:08
process and lo and behold guess what
19:10
they saw
19:11
profit at the end of the process
19:15
2022 100 billion dollars
19:19
for Pfizer
19:22
of public funds
19:25
moderna after lying to the Congress in
19:29
October of 2020 when they were asked to
19:32
actually verify whether niaid was
19:35
promoting an injection that would enrich
19:37
niaid where Anthony fauci and the entire
19:40
team at NIH said that they had no
19:42
financial interest in their
19:44
recommendation they receive a back
19:47
payment royalty of 400 million dollars
19:50
for the first payment of the royalty
19:54
400 million dollars more than any
19:57
Institute of Health has ever received in
20:00
a single payment for a single invention
20:01
in the history of American Medical
20:04
Research
20:05
and lo and behold what do we receive
20:08
after that a request from the World
20:09
Health Organization to expand its budget
20:11
by 11 to make sure that the people who
20:14
profited from it donate to it and guess
20:16
what they just did
20:18
they laundered the money right back
20:21
that's what they did
20:22
next and now you get the final slide
20:27
this is not a public health crime
20:31
this is actually not a constitutional
20:33
crime
20:34
this is a criminal act
20:37
done by a criminal institution
20:39
established to enable criminal Behavior
20:43
since its foundation in 1947 that is
20:47
what this is and we should not be
20:49
debating the merits of democracy or
20:52
Liberty or anything else as irrational
20:54
as that would be if we stood at a bank
20:57
robbery and debated the merits of
20:59
printing dollar bills
21:03
the problem is not the dollar bills it's
21:06
the bank robber
21:08
and the problem here is not health and
21:12
it's not public health and it's not the
21:14
suppression of information and the
21:16
suppression of dissident views and the
21:19
absolute unconscionable treatment of
21:21
Physicians around the world and
21:23
academicians around the world who spoke
21:25
out against this that's not the crime
21:27
the crime is that we had criminal
21:29
racketeers who can spot conspired and
21:32
developed a quote emergency the same
21:35
criminal racketeers planned manufactured
21:39
and did all agency capture to make sure
21:41
that you were told that you would use
21:43
terms that they tell you to use vaccine
21:45
face mask Health social distancing none
21:48
of which had ordinary use definition
21:51
so we just use them criminal racketeers
21:55
price fixed with interlocking
21:57
directorates where known competitors
21:58
came together and fixed prices in direct
22:01
collusion in violation of both European
22:04
Union standards and in violation of both
22:07
the Sherman and The Clayton Act in the
22:08
United States these were crimes it was
22:10
organized crime and we should treat it
22:12
as such criminal racketeers publicly
22:15
lied under oath and this resulted in the
22:19
death and destruction of Liberty and
22:21
most importantly
22:23
the death and destruction of the
22:25
Integrity of well-meaning people
22:27
who sit here today doing everything they
22:30
can within their power to try to treat
22:33
the calamities created by this
22:35
catastrophe
22:37
I Will Not For a Moment denigrate the
22:40
multiple contributions of amazing
22:42
academic and medical professionals
22:44
who've tried desperately to step into
22:47
the Gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of
22:50
these crimes but I will without doubt
22:53
say the following until we treat this as
22:57
a criminal conspiracy of criminal
22:59
racketeers resulting in global terrorism
23:02
for the purpose of profiteering and
23:05
murder until we have that conversation
23:07
we're having The Wrong conversation
23:10
because we are not here to debate the
23:13
merits of a modified agreement for a
23:16
criminal racketeering organization we
23:18
are here to end the criminal
23:20
organization itself this is my call to
23:23
every single person on this planet
23:25
don't just limit the power of The Who
23:30
destroy the who
23:32
thank you very much
23:35
foreign
 
 

Comments (0)

Rated 0 out of 5 based on 0 voters
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Rate this post:
0 Characters
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location