PRYMAT  PIOTROWY

W 1967 roku Paweł VI powiedział, że papiestwo jest góówną przeszkodą dla ekumenizmu.

W 1993 roku kard. Joseph Ratzinegr, prefekt Kongregacji Doktryny Wiary, na spotkaniu w “Evangelical Center” na temat jedności w różnorodności, która opowiada się za reformą prymatu Piotrowego, mówił o “pojednanej różnorodności”, a mianowicie “gromadzeniu się. . . To zawiera się w chęci uczenia się od siebie wzajemnie i akceptacji popraw innych, w radości i dziękczynieniu za skarby duchowe każdego, w stałej esencjalizacji własnej wiary, doktryny i praktyki”.

W 1997 roku Jan Paweł II zadeklarował, że konieczna jest reforma prymatu Piotrowego (boskiej instytucji) i to zostało potwierdzone  25.02.2000 w Egipcie, domagając się by władze ortodoksyjne i protestanckie “redefiniowały” jego rolę jako papieża (Nieprawdopodobne!)

Jan Paweł II otwarcie zadeklarował “protestantom” i “ortodoksom” swoją pełną chęć dokonania zmiany sposobu prowadzenia prymatu jurysdykcji, odmawiając wdrożenia jej w praktykę (zob. Enc. Ut unum sint”).

 

 

John Paul II,in fact, betrayed the mandate given to Peter and his successors when he claimed to take note that: «The question of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome has now become the immediate object of study»and ad-heres, therefore, to the recommendation of World Council of Churches(Protestant body)

that the Commission on Faith and Order “give impetus to a new study on the question of a “minister” (the text is in lower-case)of universal Christian uni-ty,”which may not necessarily be the Pope of the Catholic Church.

In 1993, John Paul II released his “Canon Law,”which took away the “Dogmatic Marks” of the Church: One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic,to make them: “Com-munion, Ecumenism, Collegiali-ty.”

In this vein, he downgraded then, the “the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church,” to “Church of Rome, the Church of Peter and Paul.” (See “Ut unum sint” – 05/05/1995)

John Paul II,also signed “Concordats” that no longer protects the Catholic Church, religion, or Christian values, which were all made equal.

But Pope Pius XI,however, in his “Mortalium animos,” said that this ecumenism provides for the reform of the Primacy of Peter,and that this ecumenical theory «paves the way to naturalism and atheism» and prepares«a pretense of Christian religion which is a thousand miles away from the one Church of Christ» and that« it is an quick and easy step toward the neglect of religion or indifferentism and to modernism» and that«it is nonsense and stupidity!»

Above, below and on the following pages:several examples of “papal dignity.”

Above: John Paul IIwith an Indian headress.

Top left:Vatican, May 12, 1980. John Paul II smiling in an Alpine hat.

Left: John Paul IIputs a straw hat on his head.

Below:Puebla, January 27, 1979. John Paul IIwears a straw sombrero, as protection from the sun.

Top:Mexico, May 1979. John Paul II,returning from a trip to Mexico, wearing a sombrero that was

given to him in Monterrey.

Next:Equatorial Guinea, in February 1982. During his visit, John Paul IIis protected  from the sun with a straw hat.

Above:John Paul IIdressed as an American Indian posing as if he is getting out of a tepee.

Next:Philippines, 1981.

Yet another curious pose of John Paul II in his ninth apostolic journey.

Page 76, Top left:On his trip to Pakistan in February 1981, John Paul IIdressed in a Pakistani robe.

Page 76,Top right:Nairobi, May 7, 1980. With the traditional colorful feathered headdress of the Masai warrior waving a tra-ditional staff of a tribal chief. John Paul IIgreets millions of Kenyans hurrying to Uhuru Park to attend the Pontifical Mass then, to be recited in Latin, English and in Swahili, one of the

most widely spoken languages of East Africa.

Page 76,Bottom left:Alice Springs – Australia, 1986. John Paul II,during a pastoral visit to Australia, having pictures taken with a koalain his arms, a typical teddy bear in that con-tinent.

Page 76, Bottom right:In his trip to Cape Verde, John Paul II wearing a traditional African headdress.

Val d’Aosta, 1986. John Paul IIhas just gotten out of the helicopter that brought him to the glacier peaks of Val d’Aosta,for a few vacation days of summer. The Pope has never cared that his sporting attitude perplexed some prelates of the Curia, so that one day, he jokingly confided to his friend Sandro Pertini “I’m scandalous.”

Mount “Adamello,” Brescia.

John Paul II’s love for the mountains is ev-ident from this other picture, taken on the “Adamello glacier,” where, by his ex-pressed will, the altar was placed at the highest point in Europe, more than three

thousand meters of altitude.

Page 78,Top:the Maiella Mountain – Abruzzo. In the quiet of the forest on a tree trunk, his head supported by a limb, John Paul II,tired after a walk, sleeps a peaceful slumber. It was not the first time that the Pope secretly left his residence in the Vatican, without papal robes, to de-vote himself to his favorite sports.

Page 78,Bottom left:Lobbia Alta, Adamello – Pinzolo, Trento, 1984. John Paul II (first on the left) making the sign of the cross with his companions, before beginning a descent on the glacier, Lobbia Alta. The Pope kept his passion for the mountains and even kept in his closet, his skis, boots and even his sneakers. Because he said once: “Sports can greatly influence the behavior of people.”

Page 78,Below right:John Paul II,dressed for skiing, is ready to embark on the snow. Sometimes the Pope left the Vatican in secret to go skiing, like the time he went with his secretary, Stanislaw. Then everything came to light be-cause his secretary broke his leg and had to be hospital-ized.

80

Top left:As a young man, Wojtyla loved sports, a passion main-tained by Pope This is a great photo that shows him in tennis shoes, in the Vatican.

Top right:Wadowice, Poland. Cardinal Karol Wojtyla walking in a field. It was the habit of the pope to take walks and hiking tours.

Next:Castel Gandolfo. John Paul IIclimbing down the ladder to the pool that he had wanted, which cost over two billion and where he entertained himself for an hour a day.

 

JEGO  TEOLOGIA  CIAŁA

Prawdziwego “Wojtyłę” widzi się w apostazji katolickich narodów, widzi się w rozkwicie sekt, stopniowym zanikaniu kapłaństwa, utopii “dialogu” w przeciwieństwie do prawdy. Krótko mówiąc, Jan Paweł II był najbardziej zsekularyzowanym papieżem wszechczasów, i na pewno daleko mu do bycia świętym, czy ascetycznym, ponieważ on kochał ludzką miłość. Kochał ciało, sięgał by obejmować i całować dzieci, dziewczęta i młode kobiety. Zawsze był chętny i szczęśliwy, kiedy tańczyły przed nim, często kreując żenujące i żałosne sceny, i podchodząc by tańczyć razem z nimi, sam, tak jak to zrobił podczas podróży do Australii, gdzie nawet chwalił “rock’n roll”.

 

Pragnął tych skandali także w Kościele św. Piotrze, nawet zmienił styl synodów kontynentalnych, z tańcami i śpiewem, afrykańskimi intonacjami i biciem w tam-tamy, zawsze z półnagimi tancerzami, tak jak to miało miejsce na inauguracji Afrykańskiego Synodu Biskupów; a także na innych synodach. Zawsze były sceny z tancerkami i półnagimi tancerzami. . . I takie wydarzenia miały nawet miejsce podczas “jubileuszowego” roku w Rzymie, takie jak kiedy papież pozwolił tańczyć nagim Polinezyjczykom.

 

 

 

His key points of thought on the “theology of the body” were from a very broad understand-ing of “sex,” which he confused with love for all men, disregard-ing or not acknowledging their conversion to the one eternal truth of the Gospel, and forgetting that Jesus said «Heaven and earth will pass away but My

words shall not pass away.» (Mark XIII, 31)

In 1983, on speaking of the “the-ology of the body”, John Paul II said: «“virginity” as such, is not

superior to marriage, because spirituality is given from the ex-ercise of charity.»

On May 8, 1984, in “New Guinea”, John Paul II allowed a “topless” woman student to read the epistle at Mass.

John Paul II began his aposto-late, not of faith and virtue, but of sexual relations. This was the topic that he always had at heart, both in his speaking and writing.

On January 13, 1982, at a Wednesday public audience, John Paul II revealed that the mutual and personal dis-covery, i.e. the masculinity and femininity of the naked body, are forhim the greatest revelations of the human being for themselves and for others.

Speaking of the resurrection of the body,he said that hu-man beings would rise still retaining its attributes of mas-culinity and femininity, each with their own sex. So, for John Paul II,the new state of eternal life will be in the same line of life that men had in Paradise Lost. While Jesussaid that marriage and procreation will cease with the res-urrection, John Paul II,however, said that the duality of marriage is the

image and likeness of the Blessed Trinity.

But then, sex would be the image and likeness of the “proceeding” of the Divine Persons within the meaning of life of the Trinity,and as God is three in One, man and woman are only one flesh.

Honestly, this rant of John Paul II is the rambling of a lunatic.In fact how could it be possible to experience mari-tal love outside marriage, outside of procreation? And how can it be the same union of “two”in only one flesh? And how can it be the Beatific Vision of God with erotic joy? But John Paul

IIsaid: «Our heritage will be an eter-nal eroticism, eroticism is ourcur-rent task, celestial eroticism is our

goal.»

But what will it be, then, love in Heav-en? … This nonsense of John Paul II ignores that St. Paul spoke to the Galatians and Romans of the anathema and curse on those errors and their pro-ponents,for «in Heaven

there will be neither male nor female, but all will be one in Christ.»(Gal. 3) John Paul II,however, abandoned himself to his erotic obses-sion, until he made it his doc-trine by constant preaching. It is impossible to accept this foolishness of John Paul II; that is, that eroticism in Par-adise will be the foundation of the communion of Saints, when JesusHimself said in His Gospel: «At the resur-rection…. shall neither mar-ry nor be married, but will be like angels in heaven.» (Mark 12,25) And in St.

Matthew and St. Luke: «… they are like Angels, being children of the resurrection, they are children of God.» (Luke 20,36)

“John Paul II loved her all his life.” Vatican City. One of the many meetings between Wojtyla and his close friend  and “colleague,” actress, Halina Kròlikiewicz.

Karol Wojtyla,at 34 years of age, with his students in Krakow during a hike in the mountains.

Philippines, 1981. Young dancers celebrate the presence of John Paul II.

Pacific Islands, November 1986.

Another photograph shows, once again, John Paul II’s passion for women. The Pope attends a dance in his honor. The dance is per-formed by young Samoan woman with skirts made of leaves. Even in this situation, John Paul II does not seem to feel any embarrassment. Brazil, 1980. John Paul IIwith children … in dance!

Above:In one stadium, 1200, dancers dancing,showing their best to John Paul II,because of his taste for beauty.

Vatican. Young acrobats perform in front of Pope John Paul II.

Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 19, 1989.

With rapid steps and choreography and exuberant rhythms of rock, dozens of young dancers are performing for Pope John Paul II.With a new style of preaching, the Pope made short speeches in the inter-vals between the different dances. The theme was the theatrical per-formance: The Way, the Truth and the Light.

«We would have preferred not to be placed in a situation to publicly disagree with the photo above, but the photo was published by the Magazine “Gente” on August 22, 1980, and especially since we have no other way to send our voice to the Pope, in this as in other cases. For centuries we have grown accustomed to the very different types of holiday of the Pope – which were more appropriate, namely, with the dignity of the Vicar of Christ.

Nothing bad, but not very fitting and St. Thomas teaches that comliness is one of the essential characteristics of Goodness. Is it possible that, , there is no one around the Holy Father who will put aside all boot-licking servility, and feel compelled to point out what we are finding? If the Pope does not appoint a trusted person to review in advance the details of the people and events that he intends to put on display,sooner or later, he will be in situations far more embarrassing and deplorable. Honestly, we just can’t imagine Jesus Christ attending a dance such as the Andalusian dance – with or without music.»

Izamal. John Paul IIattends a traditional Mayan dance show, during his visit to Izamal.

Above:the Vatican. John Paul IIin St. Peter’s with half-naked dancers.

Left:John Paul IIcaresses a woman.

Bottom left:John Paul IIkisses the forehead of a woman.

Below right:John Paul IIembraces a girl.

Above:Papua, New Guinea, May 8, 1984. John Paul IIgreets a top-less woman.

Next:Bologna. John Paul IIattends a performance by singer, Bob Dylan.

Below:the Vatican. Asuncion. John Paul IIkisses a child.

Vatican. John Paul II,in a pose, attempting to kiss a girl.

Above:Sydney, October 26, 1988. John Paul IIdances with young people.

Next:Vatican. John Paul IIadmires a circus exhibition with lots of mon-keys and dogs.

Below:the Vatican. John Paul IIattends the exhibition of an acrobat who, with a cigarette in her mouth, slowly arches her back, brings her legs for-ward, and grabs the cigarette with her toes.

John Paul II attends a performance by young dancers.

John Paul IIcaresses a young woman.

Above:Rome, August 19, 2000. On the fields of “Tor Vergata,”2 million young people gathered for the “Jubilee of Young People.”

Next:More than a million young people of both sexes, had been camping for five days in the fields of the University of “Tor Vergata” on the outskirts of Rome. The Vatican was the promoter of this event.

At the end of the event, the media reported that, in the work of clean-ing the areas where young people had camped, enormous quantities of used condoms were collected

Below, left and right:The same moral principles that prevailed in the vicinity of Krakow, in the ‘70s, thanks to John Paul II,became a gen-eral rule for the Catholic youth of the 90s, throughout the world.

Above:New Guinea, May 8, 1984. A “topless”student with a skirt made of leaves, reads the Epistle during the mass in front of the Pope.

Left:Rome, April 12, 1984. At the opening of the Jubilee of Sports, John Paul IIadmires an exhibition of young women in tights, on the stadium field.” Sports are “festive occasions,”the Pope said in his speech.

Below:the Vatican January 24, 1985. Italian acrobat of the Ameri-can Circus leaves, after kissing the ring of John Paul II.

Above:Brussels, 1985. Girls in leotard waiting to perform at an outdoor Mass celebrated by John Paul II,at the Basilica of Koekelberg, Brussels.

Left:Montreal, 1984. Representing peace, young dancers in billowing white skirts, are performing for John Paul IIon the playing field of the Olympic Stadium. Based on the testimony of spectators, the clothes became transparent under the stadium lights.

Below:Vatican, October 1989. “An unusual papal audi-ence,”reads the caption of “Chicago Sun Times”to describe young women who appeared in dances by John Paul II,in Nervi Hall. The girls were received in audience by the Pope, that he had reserved for athletes of the “Youth Games,”in Rome.

Rome, April 12 , 1984. 1200 women in leotards performing a synchronized dance  for John Paul II in Rome. (“Gennet Dispatch Newspaper”, April 14, 1984).

94 “Chiesa viva” *** September 2010

PODSUMOWANIE

 

 

T hese “facts” and “state-ments”of John Paul II are good reasons to judge the proposal for “beatification,”

as being superficial, and simplis-tic, lacking serious investigation and thorough analysis into his per-sonality, both recent and past, de-spite the fact that it was declared “desirable” by the current Pope

Benedict VXI.

I think it is sufficient to now con-clude these historical “facts”and “statements.” Many others could

be added to this highly question-able Polish Pope. A Pope who so abused Christianity, by dragging it

to serve Man and not God. Let us remember the prophecy of Pius XII: «There will come a day when the civilized world will re-nounce God.»

I close with the words the famous Italian writer, Indro Montanelli, who, after a conversation he had

with John Paul II and after call-ing him “a subversive Pope”, asked himself: «… but what Church does he have in mind? … Toward what kind of Church, will Pope John Paul II set off the Catholic one?»

Here are the words of Indro Montanelli: «In a conversation with John Paul II in his private apartment … I knew, or thought I understood, that this Pope would leave behind a pile of rubble: that of the au-thoritarian and hierarchical structure of the Roman Curia. Now I understand that this perception was a vaguely cata-strophic error, yes, but by default; as that which Pope John Paul II will leave behind, is not only the ruins of the Roman Curia but of the Church, at least of that one which we have been accustomed

to for two thousand years and re-gard as such and that which we, the laity, ourselves, have in our blood.» (Indro Montanelli – “Cor-riere della Sera”, March 9, 2000).

JOHN PAUL II IN FLAMES podtytul

Now, after reading this Special Is-sue on John Paul II,I believe that no one will cry out with that naive

and superficial “SAINT NOW!” but, will reflect, instead, on the “picture”taken in Beskid Zy-wiecki,a Polish village near the birthplace of John Paul II,at 21.37 on the same day, and at the exact hour when the then Pope John Paul II died.

It is a “sign,”moreover, for the place and for the time it was tak-en, when the image of John Paul II was seen in the flames of fire, which is a manifestation of the souls of demons in hell!

If this vision were true, that Wojtyla does not enjoy the beatific vision,would it be wrong to say that the Pope, in life, lost all his battles and that all his travels accompanied by vast crowds, only covered the deep voids of his mis-sion as Vicar of Christ!

 

March 22, 2000. Indro Montanelli [one of the most brilliant journalists of Italy] talking with the di-rector of the Magazine “Oggi.” Montanelli asks: «Is John Paul II the greatest restorer or greatest gravedigger of the Catholic Church?» And then affirms: «With the prostrated Church of John Paul II we are faced with sit-uations of epochal dimensions, or better Biblical. This is life or death situation of the oldest in-stitution in the world, loaded with two thousand years of history, in front of which we, laymen, (and no one, I can assure you, is more than I) are trembling with our hats in hands.» «In a conversation with John Paul II

in his private apartment … I knew, or thought I understood, that this Pope  would leave behind a pile of rubble: that of the authoritarian and hierarchical  structure of the Roman Curia. Now I understand that this perception was a vaguely catastrophic error, yes, but by default; as that which Pope John Paul II will leave behind,  is not only the ruins of the Roman Curia  but of the Church, at least of that one

which we have been accustomed to  for two thousand years and regard as such  and that which we, the laity, ourselves, have in our blood.» (Indro Montanelli – Corriere della Sera, March 9, 2000).

John Paul II.

This photograph was taken in Beskid Zywiecki, Polish village near the birthplace of Karol Wojtyla,

at the time 21.37 of the same day and at the exact hour in which the current Pope John Paul II died.